Hair is such an emotive subject and with human nature being human nature, what we would like we can’t have and what we’ve we don’t want! Wild hair and we would like straight, straight hair and we would like curly, brunette and we would like blonde, blonde and we would like red. Likewise upper lip hair on women, so valued as an indication of exquisite beauty using parts of the world, is vilified by our Western society.
Unwanted hair is really a common problem affecting most women to varying degrees throughout their lives and prompting the usage of various temporary types of hair reduction or hair management systems. It causes great distress, and it is often associated with feelings of poor self-confidence, an expression of isolation and low self worth.
Since the times when bearded women in Victorian travelling fairs were displayed for entertainment and ridicule, Western society has nurtured a stigma about excess hair. Many women are pressured into tremendous lengths to get rid of any trace of hair from any and every part of these body as they feel it to be unattractive and unappealing. However it is not merely women that are now affected… increasingly the male gender is subject to pressure from the ‘fashion’ and celebrity world and unwanted hair may be just as vilified by the male population nowadays since the female.
Different Methods of Hair Removal
Superfluous hair growth may be brought on by many factors, such as, hormone imbalance, (during puberty, pregnancy and menopause), genetics and ethnicity, hereditary, medication or topical stimulation e.g. waxing or tweezing. Therefore, electrolysis – the sole permanent method of hair removal, is cure that is in great demand by female and transsexual clients and recently, due to society’s attitudes, the amount of male clients is increasing.
To meet up this need there as always been many hair removal measures some that return back centuries in history. Hair removal ‘s been around since caveman times but interestingly the parts of the human body we’re removing hair from have differed over the ages. Removing hair from the head and face of men was originally not for vanity purposes however for survival. There’s evidence that cavemen did this but in addition the ancient Egyptians and it was undertaken, we imagine, for protection, as scraping off the beard and hair on the head would remove the main advantage of an adversary having anything to seize onto in addition to having less mites!
In ancient Egypt, Greece, and Middle Eastern countries, removing body hair was important. In fact these women removed most of these body hair, aside from eyebrows. Egyptian women removed their head hair and pubic hair was considered uncivilized by both sexes! It had been also considered uncivilized for guys to have hair on the face. Facial hair was the mark of a slave or servant, or of a person of lower class. The ancient Egyptians used a questionnaire of razors made of flint or bronze since the razor wasn’t invented till the 1760’s by French barber, Jean Jacques Perret.
They also used a method of temporary hair removal called sugaring. A sticky paste (bees wax was sometimes used) would be applied to the skin, a strip of cloth was pressed onto the wax and yanked off – the equivalent of waxing today. Wealthy women of the Roman Empire would remove their body hair with pumice stones, razors, tweezing and pastes. There is also another technique used called threading which is recently seeing a resurgence in popularity. Thin string or yarn would be placed through the fingers of both of your hands, and quickly stroked over the area. This repetitive process captured the hair and effectively tweezed, ripped or pulled the unwanted hair out. Throughout the Elizabethan times the practice of hair removal, (not of leg, armpit or pubic hair), of these eyebrows and the hair from their foreheads to be able to give the look of a longer brow and forehead was fashionable. It’s startling to notice the most obvious influence ‘fashion’ has played in hair removal from ab muscles beginning.
Waxing, sugaring, depilatory creams, bleaching, shaving, sugaring, plucking, threading and even battery-powered tweezers multiple-plucking systems, are temporary methods that numerous people try today. In fact new hair removal devices seem to look like buses – every 20 minutes or so! However, technology has shifted and with it, it seems there are some restricted and doubtful types of hair removal. X-ray and photodynamic methods are in a restricted category as the former has been banned in some countries like the USA and the latter are merely in experimental stages. Electric tweezers, transdermal electrolysis, and microwaves are some of the doubtful methods in that there’s no established data on the effectiveness.
Electrolysis continues to be the sole proven permanent method of hair removal and many women and indeed many men, have benefited using this tried and trusted treatment. It’s the case that electrologists are privileged to witness a dramatic transformation in their clients, from a timid, introverted personality at the start of a program of treatments, to a confident and happy individual once treatment is underway and results become apparent.
Whatever your opinion of hair, ‘removing it’ within our Western society is a variable million pound industry. This type of huge money making machine though will have more than its great amount of misconceptions, misunderstandings, myths and legends none that relate much to the hard reality truth. The huge profit led hair removal industry has its great amount of charlatans and scams all attracted by the huge profit led opportunities.
Hair Removal methods are generally permanent and temporary. The English dictionary definition of ‘permanent’ states: perpetual, everlasting. With this specific in mind there is only one system in the marketplace today that can totally prove ‘permanent’ hair removal primarily because longevity, client testimony and satisfaction and that is electrolysis. Invented in 1875 electrolysis offers permanent removal of hair for all hair types and colours and all skin types and colours. It continues to be utilised in hospitals by surgeons and ophthalmologists for trichaisis and other distortions of the eyelashes as well supporting a healthcare facility laser hair removal departments. It can also be considered an important tool in the work of veterinary surgeons for animals (primarily horses and dogs) for the permanent removal of distorted and in-growing eyelashes. It provides cosmetic relief for the customer with mild hirsute problems to the patient with seriously hirsute problems and for the transgender patient who may require several hours of treatment.
Apparently there’s been confusing messages coming from the regulatory bodies on definitions of what the words ‘permanent’, ‘removal’ or ‘reduction’ in the hair removal industry actually mean. Agreement was reached that when the hairs that have been removed do not grow back for an amount of one year after the final treatment, permanent reduction may be claimed. Electrolysis, invented in 1875 remains to this day, the main one method legally allowed to claim ‘permanent removal’ ;.
The newer technologies such as LASER (Light Amplification Stimulated Emission of Radiation) and IPL (Intense Pulse Light) were initially launched as competitors of electrolysis and initially marketed as THE answer for all permanent hair removal. This, 脫毛優惠 it is now realised, reaches best, somewhat nave and at worst, certainly misleading. The stark reality is that this was wishful thinking and nowadays ‘claims’ are more realistic. The reality is that whilst they have their successes they likewise have their limitations – they can not treat all hair colours and types and all skin colours successfully and they now accept their limitations and embrace electrolysis and electrologists as their back up.
Laser and IPL are allowed by the FDA to claim permanent ‘reduction’ however, not permanent ‘removal’ of hair. The reality is that this newer technology is brilliant for large areas and for dark hair. For grey or white hair it really simply doesn’t work. Laser and IPL target the melanin in the hair and if the hair is grey or white there is no melanin remaining in the hair for this to target. In addition to this, for unknown reason(s) not every one of the hair reacts to treatment and results vary from 85% – 95% success. The remaining 5% – 15% hair will undoubtedly be stripped of its melanin (thus appearing white) but still stubbornly continues to grow. This then leaves the sole option of ‘permanent hair removal’ down to additional electrolysis treatment to complete the job. Laser and IPL are now recognised to be always a hair ‘management’ system and clients are advised that regrowth may occur.
Photoepilator light energy was launched in 1969 and was developed from research into laser hair removal. Photoepilators work with a burst of filtered light targeted at one hair at a time. Following the focus of the light, the hair is tweezed. Like any laser and light instrument, the light utilized in the device is targeted contrary to the blood and melanin pigments in the hair and heats them up. Allow this process, fibre-optic probes were inserted into the hair follicle through that your light was flashed. There’s no clinical data published to date to aid any permanency claims and there is no established data on its effectiveness.
The tweezer method using its unsubstantiated claim of ‘permanent hair removal’ was initially patented in 1959. This system functions by passing an electric energy through the tweezers, which holds the hair on top of the skin by grasping them for several minutes. Electricity enters through the hair to its root and claims to permanently damage it. The scientific community has reservations since the claim of electricity destroying the basis of the hair has no scientific backup.
Transcutaneous and Transdermal offers ‘permanent Hair Removal’ but no clinical data has been published to date to determine the claim that permanent hair removal is possible using these methods. In 1985 when the usage of AC electric tweezers was stopped, the manufacturers made some modifications in the apparatus. Adhesive patches in place of cotton swabs were introduced and a name change into transcutaneous hair removal. It uses the idea of direct current (DC) for transdermal delivery of drugs (iontophoresis) without the usage of a needle. A DC electric energy is passed via a conductive gel on top of the skin via an adhesive patch positioned on the skin. The hair root is claimed to be damaged permanently by the electric energy that travels down to the hair follicle.
Currently no clinical data can be acquired and the laws of physics do not support the claims made by the manufacturers. Hair doesn’t conduct electricity but skin does. As electricity passes through the medium of poor resistance, it’ll spread along the outer lining of the skin rather than passing through the hair. Therefore, just like the tweezer method, the argument that it will reach the basis of the hair to destroy it has no scientific backup.
Ultrasound hair removal claims that ultrasound waves are channelled precisely down the hair shaft and in the process they transform to thermal energy that super heats the hair growth areas and inhibits regrowth. It’s stated that the waves are bound to the hair shaft and do not dissipate into the skin prevents any side effects.
Ultrasound hair removal offers ‘total hair removal’ and claims to function as the ‘next generation of long haul hair removal devices’ ;.It states in its marketing material that it is ‘The hair removal solution’ and that ‘no additional hair appears in the same follicle proving that this is a long-term treatment’ ;.The FDA has not given the outcome to date regarding a software to promote in April 2010 of the most recent device.